4.7 Article

Study of the oxidative methane coupling over SrO-La2O3 catalyst: Experiment and kinetic modeling

期刊

FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY
卷 213, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2020.106667

关键词

Oxidative coupling of methane; SrO-La2O3 catalyst; Kinetic modeling

资金

  1. [AAAA-A17-117041710090-3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A 7-step kinetic model of oxidative coupling of methane (OCM) on the SrO-La2O3 catalyst was developed and validated with experimental data, showing high accuracy in predicting the reaction. Compared to other models, the developed model demonstrated better agreement between experimental results and predictions.
A 7-step kinetic model of oxidative coupling of methane (OCM) to C2+ hydrocarbons over the SrO-La2O3 catalyst was developed. The experiments were carried out in a fixed bed microcatalytic reactor within a temperature range of 650 to 850 degrees C. The overall reaction scheme with the minimal number of steps that well predicts experimental data was elucidated via the base of the proposed stoichiometric (molar) analysis of the products formed in the experiments. The reaction network contains three primary and four consecutive reactions, one of them being gas-phase. The rates of each heterogeneous reaction were described by a Langmuir-Hinshelwood type rate equation. Kinetic rate parameters were estimated by fitting to experimental data. The comparison showed that the developed kinetic model predicts experiments well, the average relative deviation between the experimental and simulated data was about 5% and the relative prediction error for all variables amounted to less than 10%. The developed kinetic model was verified by comparing the simulation results with the experimental data obtained over the SrO-La2O3 catalyst and compared with the widely known schemes of OCM reaction proposed by of other authors. A better agreement was observed between the experiments and our model prediction as compared with other models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据