4.4 Article

Effect of pH on Co-precipitated Cu-ZnO-ZrO2 Catalysts Used in CO2 Hydrogenation: the Role of Zn-malachite in the Precursors

期刊

FUEL CELLS
卷 21, 期 1, 页码 31-38

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/fuce.202000032

关键词

Carbon Dioxide; Catalyst; Hydrogenation; Methanol; Precursors

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51304099, 51404122]
  2. National Key Research and Development Project of China [2018YFB0605402-02]
  3. National Key Technologies R & D Program of China [2011BAC01B03]
  4. Testing and Analyzing Foundation of Kunming University of Science and Technology [2016M20147080250, 2016T20080007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Cu-ZnO-ZrO₂ catalysts prepared at different pH levels showed varying activities in the hydrogenation of CO₂ to methanol. The influence of pH on precursor phases and interactions among elements significantly affected the catalysts' performance in terms of activity and selectivity. The presence of Zn-malachite in the precursors promoted a more intimate interdispersion of CuO and ZnO, leading to smaller Cu particles after calcination and reduction.
A series of Cu-ZnO-ZrO2 catalysts were prepared at different pH by co-precipitation method and tested for the synthesis of methanol by CO2 hydrogenation. The influence of pH on the phase formation of precursor, the average Cu particle size and the interaction among different elements were discussed in detail. The activity and selectivity of the catalysts were tested for hydrogenation of carbon dioxide to methanol. When the precipitation was conducted at pH = 8.0, in addition to aurichalcite, Zn-malachite was obviously present in the precursor and the resulting catalysts were more active. It was found that the pH exerts its effect through altering the phase composition of the precursors. The present of Zn-malachite in the precursors facilitates the formation of more intimate interdispersion of CuO and ZnO, and the smallest Cu particle after calcination and reduction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据