4.7 Article

Performance of MnCl2 doped magnetic iron-carbon sorbent on mercury removal from flue gas: The effect of O2 and SO2

期刊

FUEL
卷 285, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119064

关键词

Mercury oxidation; MnCl2; Modified magnetic sorbent; SO2 resistance

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51876073]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study focused on improving the efficiency of mercury removal by adding MnCl2 to magnetic iron-carbon, finding that higher impregnation solution concentrations led to more MnCl2 loaded sorbents but with poorer physical properties. Experimental results showed that the presence of oxygen can facilitate mercury oxidation, while the resistance to SO2 can be enhanced after doping.
In order to get a more stable and efficient sorbent on mercury removal from flue gas, MnCl2 has been used to improve the sorption capacity of magnetic iron-carbon. BET and XRF tests have been conducted to demonstrate the characteristic properties of the obtained doped sorbents. Higher concentrations of impregnation solution lead to more MnCl2 loaded sorbents but these present worse physical properties. Experiments have been conducted under different conditions to investigate the effects of O-2 and SO2. Mercury sorption capacity and SO2 resistance of modified magnetic carbon have been strengthened after doping with MnCl2. The presence of O-2 in flue gas can further facilitate mercury oxidation and weaken the inhibition of SO2. The mechanism of mercury oxidation is closely related to the manganese in sorbent whenever oxygen is present. XPS test results reveal that O-2 facilitates conversion of Mn to oxidation states, which can easily accept electrons from Hg-0, thereby accelerating the oxidation of Hg-0. In addition, HgO is confirmed as the main form of mercury compound after reactions when O-2 was introduced. DFT calculation results also reveal the mercury oxidation mechanism in those reactions with oxygen participation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据