4.7 Article

Gas explosions of methane-air mixtures in a large-scale tube

期刊

FUEL
卷 285, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119239

关键词

Methane-air mixture explosion; Large-scale tube; OpenFOAM; Experimental study; Numerical simulation

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2015CB058000]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52008392]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20190571]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the loading characteristics of gas explosions inside a large-scale tube through experiments and numerical simulations, revealing that vents can reduce peak pressure and increase flame travel distance. It was found that peak pressure increases with concentration and reaches maximum when the gas concentration is between 7.5% to 9.5%.
12 batches of premixed methane-air mixture explosion tests were conducted in a 30 m long testing tube with section dimensions of 0.8 m x 0.8 m to explore the loading characteristics of gas explosion inside the tube. The pressure-time histories and flame travel distance of each test were recorded and analyzed. A 3D numerical model was developed and numerical simulations were carried out by using the open-source Computation Fluid Dynamic (CFD) toolbox OpenFOAM. Based on testing and numerical results, the characteristics of gas explosion loading inside the large-scale tube were revealed. It is found that the existence of vents can reduce the peak pressure by 13%-91% and increase the flame travelling distance inside the tube. The peak pressure increases with the rising concentration when the gas concentration range is 7.5%-9.5% and decreases with the rising concentration when the gas concentration ranges 9.5%-11.5%. End venting can reduce the peak pressure along the tube by 17%-69%. With the decrease of vent number, the gas explosion inside the tube is enhanced and the side vents closed to the ignition can reduce the gas explosion loads inside the tube effectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据