4.7 Article

Length Dispersion mechanism of coal water slurry prepared by mixing various high-concentration organic waste liquids

期刊

FUEL
卷 287, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119340

关键词

Organic waste liquid; Coal water slurry; DLVO theory; Additive; Viscosity

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFB0600505]
  2. 2019 Zhejiang University Academic Award for Outstanding Doctoral Candidates

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study addresses the difficulty in treating high-concentration organic waste liquids by using xanthan gum to prepare waste liquid coal water slurry (WCWS). The addition of 0.08 wt% xanthan gum resulted in a stable dispersion of the mixed waste liquid with an apparent viscosity of 921.1 mPa.s. Xanthan gum introduced steric hindrance interaction energy into the WCWS system, enabling stable dispersion.
High-concentration organic waste liquids have complex components and their treatment is difficult. These liquids also contain hydrophobic organic pollutants. The preparation of waste liquid coal water slurry (WCWS) can aid with environmental protection and resource utilization. In this study, xanthan gum was selected from 11 types of additives because it overcomes the problem of solution incompatibility during the mixing of various high-concentration organic waste liquids. The experimental results showed that with 0.08 wt% addition of xanthan gum, no stratification occurred in the mixed waste liquid and the apparent viscosity of the WCWS was 921.1 mPa.s. In this study, the role of xanthan gum was studied, and the effect of its addition on the coal particle surface was characterized by zeta potential and contact angle measurement. In addition, various interaction energies in the WCWS system were calculated using the extended DLVO theory. The results showed that xanthan gum introduced steric hindrance interaction energy into the WCWS system, enabling the system to be stably dispersed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据