4.7 Article

Phosphomolybdic acid/graphene oxide as novel green catalyst using for biodiesel production from waste cooking oil via electrolysis method: Optimization using with response surface methodology (RSM)

期刊

FUEL
卷 287, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119528

关键词

Phosphomolybdic acid; Heterogeneous catalyst; Biodiesel; Electrolysis method; Graphene oxide; Response surface methodology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, biodiesel was successfully prepared using a novel catalyst of phosphomolybdic acid/support graphene oxide. The production of biodiesel from waste cooking oil was achieved by the electrolysis method, and the trans-esterification reaction process was optimized using response surface methodology.
In this study, biodiesel (FAME) was prepared using a novel heterogeneous catalyst of phosphomolybdic acid (H3PMo12O40, HPMo)/support graphene oxide (GO). The characterization of the catalyst was evaluated by SEM, EDX, Map analysis, TEM, FT-IR, and Raman analyses. The production of biodiesel from waste cooking oil (WCO) was carried out by the electrolysis method. The process of the trans-esterification reaction was optimized by applying the response surface methodology (RSM) based on the central composite design (CCD) approach. The effects of four independent variables of methanol to oil molar ratio (6-12 mol:mol), catalyst weight (0.5-1.5 wt %), time (8-24 h), and voltage (30-70 V) were examined. The highest biodiesel yield was 90.39% at optimum conditions of room temperature, the catalyst weight of 0.85 wt%, the voltage of 60 V, time of 15 h, methanol to oil, and THF to methanol molar ratios of 6:1 and 0.5:1, respectively. Based on the obtained results, all studied variables had significant impacts on the FAME yield. The catalyst was used four times in the trans-esterification reaction without any significant reduction in the yield. The quality of biodiesel was confirmed by H-NMR and FTIR analyses, and its physicochemical properties were in agreement with the ASTM standard.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据