4.7 Article

Efficient plasma-catalysis coupling for CH4 and CO2 transformation in a fluidized bed reactor: Comparison with a fixed bed reactor

期刊

FUEL
卷 288, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119575

关键词

CH4 and CO2; Non-thermal plasma; Fluidized bed; Plasma - catalyst interaction; Alumina

资金

  1. ANR
  2. European Union (ERDF)
  3. Region Nouvelle Aquitaine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated the transformation of methane and carbon dioxide by coupling plasma and catalysis using a fluidized bed reactor. It was found that there is a correlation between the surface area of alumina and reactant conversion, with the highest surface area alumina achieving the best conversions in the plasma-fluidized bed. This indicates that an efficient coupling of plasma and catalysis can be achieved with solid particles moving in the gas flow.
The transformation of methane and carbon dioxide by coupling plasma and catalysis was investigated using a fluidized bed reactor and the results, in terms of reactant conversion and yields in products, were compared with those obtained in a fixed bed reactor. A series of alumina, including a commercial sample and various mesomacro materials synthesized in the laboratory, was tested in this study. Their surface areas varied from 260 to 312 m(2) g(-1) depending on their calcination temperature. A correlation between reactant conversion and surface area of alumina was highlighted for the plasma-fluidized bed, the best conversions being reached with the alumina presenting the highest surface area. CH4 conversion increased from 8.5 to 12.1% for S = 260 and 312 m(2) g(-1) respectively and the CO2 conversion from 3.4 to 6.2% for a deposited power of 4 W, in an excess of CO2. This correlation was not corroborated for the fixed bed reactor. It proves that an efficient coupling of plasma and catalysis can be expected as soon as solid particle are moving in the gas flow, enhancing the plasma-surface interaction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据