4.7 Article

Differential scanning calorimetry coupled with machine learning technique: An effective approach to determine the milk authenticity

期刊

FOOD CONTROL
卷 121, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107585

关键词

Differential scanning calorimetry; Machine learning; Adulteration detection; Milk

资金

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior - Brasil (CAPES) [001]
  2. Instituto Federal de Educacao, Ciencia e Tecnologia do Rio de Janeiro (IFRJ)
  3. Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa Cientifica (CNPQ)
  4. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa no Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study successfully detected adulteration in raw bovine milk using DSC coupled with machine-learning tools, with GBM and MLP achieving 100% classification capability and RF showing optimal performance as well. Different models had varying important predictors, showcasing a multidimensional approach with practical potential for adoption by the dairy industry.
Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) coupled with machine-learning tools (random forest, gradient boosting machine, and multilayer perceptmn, RF, GBM, MLP) were used to detect adulteration of raw bovine milk (formaldehyde, whey, urea, and starch). Adulterated samples presented a different DSC profile from raw milk. GBM and MLP were able to classify 100% of adulterated samples, whereas RF showed optimal performance with recognition and prediction capability of 100% and 88.5%, respectively. Overall, peak temperature of crystallization was the most important discriminating predictor for GBM and RF models, whereas peak temperature of boiling followed by onset temperature of crystallization and onset temperature of boiling were the most important predictors for MLP model. The detection of adulteration in milk has a multidimensional approach and DSC associated with machine-learning methods present an interesting perspective with practical potential to be adopted by the dairy industry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据