4.7 Article

An international probabilistic risk assessment of acute dietary exposure to pesticide residues in relation to codex maximum residue limits for pesticides in food

期刊

FOOD CONTROL
卷 121, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107563

关键词

Acute dietary exposure; Pesticide residue; Probabilistic dietary exposure assessment; Codex maximum residue limits

资金

  1. Government of Australia, Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The World Health Organization conducted a probabilistic dietary exposure assessment to evaluate actual acute dietary exposure to 38 pesticides in eight countries, finding no appreciable risk for all countries and populations considered. Most of the Codex maximum residue limits would provide a high level of protection even without a specific request from risk managers.
The Joint Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)/World Health Organization (WHO) Meeting on Pesticide Residues (JMPR) is the scientific body assessing the risk of exposure to pesticide residues in food and proposing maximum residue levels (MRLs) to the Codex Alimentarius Commission. When agreed, these levels become Codex maximum residue limits (CXLs), to be potentially adopted by countries and used as references for trade disputes. In the context of a review of models and methodologies used by JMPR to assess acute dietary exposure to pesticide residues, WHO performed a probabilistic dietary exposure assessment, which takes into consideration actual measured pesticide residues and agricultural practices, to serve as a real world-based estimate of the actual acute dietary exposure to 38 pesticides in eight countries. The results show the absence of appreciable risk for all countries and populations considered, even with the conservative scenario based on 100% usage of pesticides in all foods. Moreover, our results indicate that, with only a few exceptions, most of the CXLs established by the Codex Alimentarius Commission would provide a high level of protection even if risk managers do not request a specific level of protection from risk assessors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据