4.7 Article

Structural identification of sour compounds in wine and tea by ambient ionization mass spectrometry according to characteristic product ion and neutral loss

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 353, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129446

关键词

Structure; Sour compound; Ambient ionization mass spectrometry; Product ion; Neutral loss; Wine; Tea; Fragmentation pathway

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) project [31571884]
  2. Beijing Technology and Business University Youth Scholar Funds [PXM2019_014213_000007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study utilized AI-Q-Orbitrap mass spectrometry to investigate the structure and diversity of sour compounds, proposing fragmentation pathway schemes and summarizing structure information of characteristic product ions and neutral losses. Ultimately, multiple classes of sour compounds were successfully identified in wine and tea.
Sourness is an important food taste for human. A rapid, accurate method was used to generalize the structure similarity and diversity of sour compounds. Based on the product ion and neutral loss of sour compounds, ambient ionization techniques combined with quadrupole-Orbitrap mass spectrometry (AI-Q-Orbitrap) was employed. According to the behavior of sour compounds in the process of high collision dissociation (HCD) of MS/MS, three fragmentation pathway schemes were proposed: (1) charge-driven fragmentation and CO2 loss, (2) six-membered ring rearrangement and C alpha-C beta cleavage, and (3) elimination rearrangement and H2O, CO2 and CO loss in succession. Besides, structure information about characteristic product ions and characteristic neutral losses was summarized. Finally, multi-class sour compounds including monoacids, diacids, polyacids and phenolic acids in wine and tea were identified and compared. Therefore, sour compounds and their structure information can be determined by AI-MS based on characteristic product ion and neutral loss.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据