4.7 Review

Metal-organic frameworks for food applications: A review

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 354, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129533

关键词

Active compound carriers; Controlled release systems; Extractors; Food nanotechnology; Porous composite materials; Sensors

资金

  1. Council for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA) - Research Centre for Olive, Fruit and Citrus Crops
  2. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas (CONICET)
  3. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata (UNMdP)
  4. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica (ANPCyT) [PICT-20171362]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

MOFs are high surface-to-volume ratio crystalline hybrid porous coordination materials composed of metal ions as nodes and organic linkers. They have various food applications, such as active food contact materials, antimicrobial nanocarriers, and controlled release nanosystems.
Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are high surface-to-volume ratio crystalline hybrid porous coordination materials composed of metal ions as nodes and organic linkers. The goal of this paper was to provide an updated and comprehensive state-of-the-art review of MOFs for different food applications such as active food contact materials, antimicrobial nanocarriers, controlled release nanosystems for active compounds, nanofillers for food packaging materials, food nanoreactors, food substance nanosensors, stabilizers and immobilizers for active compounds and enzymes, and extractors of food contaminants. Extraction and sensing of several food contaminants have been the main food applications of MOFs. The other applications listed above require further investigation, as they are at an early stage. However, interesting results are being reported for these other fields. Finally, an important limitation of MOFs has been the use of non-renewable feedstocks for their synthesis, but this has recently been solved through the manufacture and use of ?-cyclodextrin-based MOFs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据