4.7 Article

Study on the bioavailability of stevioside-encapsulized lutein and its mechanism

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 354, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129528

关键词

Lutein; Stevioside; Nanoparticle; Structural characteristics; Bioavailability; Mechanism

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20201241]
  2. Independent Innovation Fund Project of Agricultural Science and Technology in Jiangsu Province [CX(20)3045, CX(20)3047]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31801541]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study successfully developed lutein nanoparticles encapsulated by stevioside, demonstrating significant improvement in lutein bioavailability through multiple transmembrane pathways. The interactions between lutein and stevioside, as well as the promotion of protein expressions in both cellular and animal models, contribute to the enhanced absorption and distribution of lutein in vivo.
This study aims to develop novel lutein nanoparticles encapsulized by stevioside (LUT-STE, 165 ? 2 nm average particles size) and systematically evaluate its bioavailability. Multiple spectroscopy and NMR analyses showed lutein and stevioside could interact through hydrogen bonds, C?H?n interaction and van der Waals forces. Molecular docking simulation showed lutein was well distributed in the hydrophobic cavity of stevioside. Analyzed by Caco-2 cellular models, the transported amount of LUT-STE was 2.39 times that of lutein in 120 min with a Papp (B ? A)/Papp (A ? B) value of 0.63 ? 0.04. Nystatin and dynasore significantly reduced the cellular uptake of LUT-STE by 41.3% and 57.7%, respectively. Compared with free lutein, LUT-STE increased the Cmax in mice plasma by 5.01-fold and promoted the accumulation in multiple organs. LUT-STE promoted the protein expressions of CD36, NPC1L1 and PPAR? in both cell and animal models. In conclusion, stevioside entrapment significantly promote the bioavailability of lutein through multiple transmembrane pathways.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据