4.7 Article

Modified EMR-lipid method combined with HPLC-MS/MS to determine folates in egg yolks from laying hens supplemented with different amounts of folic acid

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 337, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127767

关键词

Folates; LC-MS/MS; EMR-lipid; Egg yolk

资金

  1. Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Project [CAAS-XTCX20190025-8]
  2. Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program [ASTIP-IAS12]
  3. Special Basic Research Fund for Central Public Research Institutes [2019-YWF-YB-01]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality [6184049]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A simplified pre-treatment method was developed for analyzing the folate content in eggs, showing that the main form of folate in egg yolks is 5-methyltetrahydrofolate. Laying hens efficiently converted folic acid in feed into 5-methyltetrahydrofolate in eggs with minimal folic acid deposition.
Egg yolks are a good source of folates. However, the method for analyzing the naturally occurring folates in egg yolks is complicated and time-consuming. In this study, a simplified pre-treatment method followed by validated HPLC-MS/MS was developed to determine native folates in eggs from laying hens treated with different amounts of folic acid. The modified enhanced matrix removal -lipid method to purify samples showed good performance in lipid elimination, reduction of steps and time savings. According to experimental analysis, yolks contained total folate amounts ranging from 147 to 760 mu g/100 g when laying hens' diet was supplemented with folic acid from 0 to 10 mg/kg. Four folate vitamers were detected in egg yolks: 5-methyltetrahydrofolate accounted for 91-98% of total folates, whereas folic acid, 5-formyltetrahydrofolate and 10-formylfolic acid together accounted for 2-9%. Therefore, laying hens efficiently converted folic acid in feed into 5-methyltetrahydrofolate in eggs with little folic acid deposition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据