4.7 Article

Public health risk-benefit assessment of red meat in France: Current consumption and alternative scenarios

期刊

FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY
卷 149, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2021.111994

关键词

Colorectal cancer; Cardiovascular disease; Iron deficiency anemia; DALY; Public health

资金

  1. Microbiologie et chaine alimentaire department from the Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique
  2. Region Pays de la Loire [34000653]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Consumption of red meat is associated with risks of colorectal cancer, cardiovascular disease, and foodborne diseases, but can also benefit reduction of iron deficiency anemia. Assessing health risks and benefits for different sub-populations is important for providing tailored recommendations.
Consumption of red meat has been associated with the risks of colorectal cancer (CRC), cardiovascular disease (CVD), foodborne-pathogen related diseases and with the potential benefit obtained by reduction of iron deficiency anemia (IDA). Based on probabilistic models, current risks and benefit for the French population were aggregated into a single metric, the disability adjusted life years (DALY). In France, per 100,000 people, current red meat consumption was responsible for a mean of 19 DALYs due to CRC, 21 DALYs to CVD and 7 DALYs to foodborne diseases. Current consumption of iron throughout the diet led to a mean of 15 DALYs due to IDA. To mitigate the risks, scenarios were built per sub-population of age and gender. Among adult and elderly population, the big meat eaters would benefit to adhere to the current recommendation (less than 500 g/w): the risks of CRC and CVD would decrease. Regarding IDA (scenario built with fixed ground beef amount), for young population, a consumption of 375g/w would be sufficient to eliminate the burden while for 25-44 years-old females, 455g/w would reduce IDA, but not entirely. This study highlighted the importance of assessing health risk-benefit per sub-populations and the necessity of communicating the results accordingly.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据