4.7 Article

Leukocyte chemotactic receptor Fpr1 protects against aging-related posterior subcapsular cataract formation

期刊

FASEB JOURNAL
卷 35, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1096/fj.202002135R

关键词

cataract; chemoattractant receptor; eye; formyl peptide; G protein; knockout mouse

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cataracts are a common consequence of aging, but the pathogenesis is still poorly understood. Mice lacking Fpr1 develop cataracts after 3 months of age without evidence of infection or inflammation, suggesting a potential role for Fpr1 in preventing cataract formation and lens degeneration. The expression of Fpr1 in lens cells may play a protective role against cataracts during aging.
Cataracts are a common consequence of aging; however, pathogenesis remains poorly understood. Here, we observed that after 3 months of age mice lacking the G protein-coupled leukocyte chemotactic receptor Fpr1 (N-formyl peptide receptor 1) began to develop bilateral posterior subcapsular cataracts that progressed to lens rupture and severe degeneration, without evidence of either systemic or local ocular infection or inflammation. Consistent with this, Fpr1 was detected in both mouse and human lens in primary lens epithelial cells (LECs), the only cell type present in the lens; however, expression was confined to subcapsular LECs located along the anterior hemispheric surface. To maximize translucency, LECs at the equator proliferate and migrate posteriorly, then differentiate into lens fiber cells by nonclassical apoptotic signaling, which results in loss of nuclei and other organelles, including mitochondria which are a rich source of endogenous N-formyl peptides. In this regard, denucleation and posterior migration of LECs were abnormal in lenses from Fpr1(-/-) mice, and direct stimulation of LECs with the prototypic N-formyl peptide agonist fMLF promoted apoptosis. Thus, Fpr1 is repurposed beyond its immunoregulatory role in leukocytes to protect against cataract formation and lens degeneration during aging.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据