4.5 Article

Plasma metabolomic profiling of central serous chorioretinopathy

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL EYE RESEARCH
卷 203, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2020.108401

关键词

Central serous chorioretinopathy; Targeted metabolomics; Taurine

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81770943, 81470651]
  2. National key research and development program [2016YFC0904801, 2017YFC0111204]
  3. Research Fund for Science and Technology Program of Beijing [Z171100002217081, Z161100000516037]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study identified 61 altered metabolites in the blood plasma of central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) patients and selected taurine as a potential biomarker for CSC. This research provides a novel understanding of CSC at the molecular level and highlights the importance of taurine in the disease.
Our study aimed to investigate metabolites alterations in the blood plasma of central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) patients and to identify the key biomarkers to increase the understanding of the mechanism of CSC at the molecular level. Quantitative and targeted metabolomics using liquid chromatography tandem-mass spectrometry (LCMS, Biocrates P500) assays were performed on plasma samples from the 42 subjects(CSC patients = 30, control = 12) enrolled at the Department of Ophthalmology of People's Hospital Peking University. A total of 61 altered metabolites were distinguished between CSC patients and controls. Taurine was selected as a candidate biomarker for CSC among 6 potential metobolites: taurine, glutamic acid, sarcosine, lactic acid, glutamine and C18_1. The P values of these potential metabolites were 1.01E-06, 7.35E-08, 1.27E-24, and 1.85E-10, 1.02E-05 and 8.59E-08, and the areas under the curve for them were 0.926, 0.991, 1.000, 0.900, 0.897 and 0.841, respectively. This study is the first to identify that taurine may be a biologically relevant biomarker for CSC and to provide a novel understanding of CSC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据