4.7 Article

Imidazole-containing photoinitiators for fabrication of sub-micron structures by 3D two-photon polymerization

期刊

EUROPEAN POLYMER JOURNAL
卷 145, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2020.110209

关键词

Two-photon photoinitiator; Imidazole; Polymerization; Photoresist

资金

  1. Russian Science Foundation [19-73-10173]
  2. Russian Science Foundation [19-73-10173] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Three imidazole-containing compounds were used as initiators of two-photon polymerization for the first time, and one compound containing phenanthroline combined with triethanolamine showed the best performance in terms of fabrication window, degree of conversion, and two-photon polymerization threshold. This photocomposition was proposed as an effective photoresist for 3D two-photon polymerization, resulting in the fabrication of sub-micron and cell-like polymer structures.
Three imidazole-containing compounds with a phenanthroline and phenanthrene fragment were for the first time applied as initiators of two-photon polymerization individually and in combination with amines. The characterization of the novel two-photon photoinitiators was performed both theoretically and experimentally. The conducted DFT calculations revealed a correlation between nonlinear optical properties (dipole moment, mean polarizability, anisotropy of polarizability, first hyperpolarizability) and the photoinitiating activity of the compounds in one- and two-photon polymerization. A photocomposition based on phenanthroline-containing imidazole and triethanolamine demonstrated the widest fabrication window, the highest degree of conversion, as well as the two-photon polymerization threshold two times lower than the commonly used commercial IP-L photoresist. Consequently, the most effective photocomposition was proposed as imidazole photoresist for 3D two-photon polymerization and used for the fabrication of sub-micron and cell-like polymer structures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据