3.9 Article

Antibacterial hydrogel coating in joint mega-prosthesis: results of a comparative series

期刊

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1007/s00590-021-02884-7

关键词

Infection; Prevention; Mega-prosthesis; Mega-implants; Coating; Hydrogel; DAC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study showed that an antibacterial hydrogel coating can safely protect joint mega-prosthesis, reducing early surgical site infections without any adverse effects. Larger prospective trials with longer follow-ups are needed to confirm these findings.
PurposeJoint mega-prosthesis after bone tumors, severe trauma or infection is associated with high rates of post-surgical septic complications. A fast-resorbable antibacterial hydrogel coating (DAC (R), Defensive Antibacterial Coating) has previously been shown to be able to significantly reduce surgical site infection in various clinical settings. Aim of the present study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the DAC hydrogel coating to prevent early periprosthetic joint infection after joint mega-prosthesis.MethodsIn this three-centers, case-control study, 43 patients, treated with an antibacterial hydrogel coated mega-prosthesis for oncological (N=39) or non-oncological conditions (N=4), were retrospectively compared with 43 matched controls, treated with mega-implants without the coating. Clinical, laboratory and radiographic examinations were performed to evaluate the occurrence of post-surgical infection, complications and adverse events.ResultsAt a mean follow-up of 2 years, no evidence of infection or adverse events were observed in the DAC-treated group, compared to six cases of post-surgical infection in the control group.ConclusionThis matched case-control study shows that a fast-resorbable, antibiotic-loaded coating can be safely used to protect joint mega-prosthesis, providing a reduction of early surgical site infections with no side effects. Larger prospective trials with longer follow-ups are warranted to confirm this report.Trial registrationRS1229/19 (Regina Elena National Cancer Institute Experimental Registry Number)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据