4.7 Article

Performance benchmarking of achievements in the Olympics: An application of Data Envelopment Analysis with restricted multipliers

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH
卷 294, 期 3, 页码 1202-1212

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2021.02.040

关键词

Data envelopment analysis; Olympic; Multiplier formulation; Decomposition of efficiency; Prediction of medal tallies

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [17K01251]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17K01251] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study combines a data fitting technique with traditional DEA models to show the impact of medal total achievement ratio and medal unit value index on model efficiency. These decompositions can be used to analyze the effectiveness of host nations and athlete development initiatives, while also demonstrating the high feasibility of Brazil's target of being in the top 10 medals table in Rio 2016.
Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a useful tool for measuring the relative efficiencies of participating nations in the Olympic Games. DEA models with restricted multipliers have been used to refine efficiency evaluations by imposing additional information. Existing DEA models for evaluating Olympic medals do not focus on multiplier restrictions regarding input. To fill this research gap, this study incorporates a data fitting technique of medal prediction using ordinary least squares regression in input multiplier restrictions of the conventional DEA model. We show that the efficiency of the proposed model can be decomposed into the achievement ratio of substantial medal total and the unit value index of medals. Such decompositions can be used to analyze the effectiveness of host nations and athlete development initiatives. For an illustrative empirical application, we examine the target that the Brazilian Olympic Committee (BOC) set for the 2016 Summer Olympic Games (Rio 2016). Our results explain the extremely high feasibility of Brazil's target of being in the top 10 medals table in Rio 2016. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据