4.5 Article

Ursodeoxycholic acid impairs liver-infiltrating T-cell chemotaxis through IFN-γ and CX3CL1 production in primary biliary cholangitis

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 51, 期 6, 页码 1519-1530

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/eji.202048589

关键词

CX3CL1; IFN‐ γ liver‐ infiltrating T cells; primary biliary cholangitis; ursodeoxycholic acid

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [JP26860499]
  2. National Institutes of Health [DK067003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The primary treatment for primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), works by suppressing the production of IFN-gamma and CX3CL1 to reduce inflammation, ultimately decreasing the chemotactic and adhesive abilities of liver-infiltrating T cells in PBC.
Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is the primary treatment for primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), but its mechanism of action remains unclear. Studies suggest that UDCA enhances NF erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NFE2L2) expression and that the interaction between IFN-gamma and C-X3-C motif chemokine ligand 1 (CX3CL1) facilitates biliary inflammation in PBC. Therefore, we examined the effects of UDCA on the expression of IFN-gamma and CX3CL1 in in vitro and in vivo PBC models such as human liver tissue, a murine model, cell lines, and isolated human intrahepatic biliary epithelial cells (IHBECs). We observed a significant decrease in IFN-gamma mRNA levels and positive correlations between IFN-gamma and CX3CL1 mRNA levels post-UDCA treatment in PBC livers. NFE2L2-mediated transcriptional activation was significantly enhanced in UDCA-treated Jurkat cells. In 2-octynoic acid-immunized mice, IFN-gamma production by liver-infiltrating T cells was dependent on NFE2L2 activation. IFN-gamma significantly and dose-dependentlyinduced CX3CL1 expression, which was significantly decreased in HuCC-T1 cells and IHBECs upon UDCA treatment. These results suggest that UDCA-induced suppression of IFN-gamma and CX3CL1 production attenuates the chemotactic and adhesive abilities of liver-infiltrating T cells in PBC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据