4.5 Article

A prospective STudy using invAsive haemodynamic measurements foLLowing catheter ablation for AF and early HFpEF: STALL AF-HFpEF

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE
卷 23, 期 5, 页码 785-796

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.2122

关键词

Atrial fibrillation; HFpEF; Improvement; Exercise wedge pressure; Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure; Sinus rhythm; Reversal

资金

  1. Abbott

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that atrial fibrillation ablation in early heart failure patients can improve symptoms and exercise hemodynamic parameters. Restoration of sinus rhythm in patients with AF and HFpEF can lead to improvements in haemodynamic parameters and symptoms.
Aims The impact of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation in early heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is unknown. Our aim was to determine the impact of AF ablation on symptoms and exercise haemodynamic parameters of early HFpEF. Methods and results Symptomatic AF patients referred for index AF ablation with ejection fraction >= 50% underwent baseline quality of life questionnaires, echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, exercise right heart catheterisation (exRHC), and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) testing. HFpEF was defined by resting pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) >= 15 mmHg or peak exercise PCWP >= 25 mmHg. Patients with HFpEF were offered AF ablation and follow-up exRHC >= 6 months post-ablation. Of 54 patients undergoing baseline evaluation, 35 (65%) had HFpEF identified by exRHC. HFpEF patients were older (64 +/- 10 vs. 54 +/- 13 years, P < 0.01), and more frequently female (54% vs. 16%, P < 0.01), hypertensive (63% vs. 16%, P < 0.001), and suffering persistent AF (66% vs. 11%, P < 0.001), compared to those without HFpEF. Twenty HFpEF patients underwent AF ablation and follow-up exRHC 12 +/- 6 months post-ablation. Nine (45%) patients no longer fulfilled exRHC criteria for HFpEF at follow-up. Patients remaining arrhythmia free (n = 9, 45%) showed significant improvements in peak exercise PCWP (29 +/- 4 to 23 +/- 2 mmHg, P < 0.01) and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLHF) score (55 +/- 30 to 22 +/- 30, P < 0.01) while the remainder did not (PCWP 31 +/- 5 to 30.0 +/- 4 mmHg, P = NS; MLHF score 55 +/- 23 to 25 +/- 20, P = NS). Conclusion Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction frequently coexists in patients with symptomatic AF and preserved ejection fraction. Restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with comorbid AF and HFpEF improves haemodynamic parameters, BNP and symptoms associated with HFpEF.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据