4.5 Article

UV light-based reprocessing of flexible endoscopes without working channel in Oto-Rhino-Laryngology: an effective method?

期刊

EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY
卷 278, 期 10, 页码 4075-4080

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-021-06737-1

关键词

Hygiene; Sterilization; Disinfection; Microbiology

资金

  1. Projekt DEAL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study showed that Impelux (TM) UV-C light technology efficiently reduces bacterial contamination of flexible endoscopes and eliminates protein residuals, providing a potential solution for clinical use.
Background Reprocessing of flexible endoscopes (FEs) is often expensive, time consuming, and becomes increasingly complex, due to rising demands of hygiene. After beneficial results in reprocessing of rigid endoscopes using Impelux (TM) UV-C light technology, we tested the same method for reprocessing of FEs without working channel. Materials and methods Testing was performed on FEs without working channel after routine clinical use (transnasal flexible endoscopy). Disinfection consisted of mechanical precleaning and 60 s exposure to Impelux (TM) UV-C light technology. Bacterial contamination was tested on 50 FEs before and after disinfection. Further 50 FEs regarding protein residuals. The absolute effectiveness of the D60 was tested on 50 test bodies (RAMS) with a standardized contamination of 10(7) colony-forming units (CFU) of Enterococcus faecium. Results The FEs were contaminated with a high average value of 916.7 CFU (+/- 1057 CFU) after clinical usage. After reprocessing, an average contamination of 2.8 CFU (+/- 1.6) on 14% (n = 7) of the FEs was detected consisting of non-pathogenic species, the remaining FE were sterile. After reprocessing, all FEs were protein-free (< 1 mu g). The artificially contaminated test bodies showed no remaining bacterial contamination after disinfection, resulting in an average absolute germ reduction of about 10(7) CFU. Conclusion Impelux (TM) UV-C light technology efficiently reduces bacterial contamination of FEs and might be useful in daily practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据