4.5 Article

Validation study of a novel approach for assessment of retronasal olfactory function with combination of odor thresholds and identification

期刊

EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY
卷 278, 期 10, 页码 3847-3856

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-021-06687-8

关键词

Olfactory disorders; Retronasal olfaction; Retronasal threshold test; Retronasal identification test; Olfaction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to establish a test battery for clinical assessment of retronasal odor thresholds and identification, finding significant correlations between retronasal and orthonasal olfaction. The retronasal TI score can effectively differentiate between healthy controls and patients with olfactory dysfunction.
Purpose The present study aimed to establish a test battery for the clinical assessment of retronasal odor thresholds and retronasal odor identification. Study design Prospective case-control series. Methods Sixty participants (36 women, 24 men, mean age 37.6 +/- 19.4 years) were enrolled in this study; 36 were healthy controls and 24 were patients with olfactory dysfunction. Orthonasal olfactory function was assessed with the Sniffin' Sticks test battery. Retronasal olfaction was assessed with oral odorant delivery using special containers for threshold function, and with oral tasteless powders for odor identification. Results Retronasal and orthonasal olfaction were significantly correlated for threshold scores, identification score, and the sum of threshold and identification score (TI score). Validity analyses showed that the retronasal TI score was able to discriminate between healthy controls and patients with olfactory dysfunction. Conclusions Normosmic participants can be distinctly differentiated from patients with olfactory dysfunction using a valid test battery comprised of retronasal threshold and identification tests. Based on the current findings, we advocate a TI score of 16 as a cut-off between patients and controls. Therefore, TI scores of 17 and above would indicate retronasal normosmia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据