4.7 Article

Influence of the Three Gorges Reservoir on climate drought in the Yangtze River Basin

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 28, 期 23, 页码 29755-29772

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-12704-4

关键词

Climate change; Three Gorges Reservoir; El Niñ o-Southern Oscillation; Yangtze River Basin

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41971037]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that the construction of the Three Gorges Reservoir increased the relative humidity of the Yangtze River Basin, providing a more humid climate for the downstream area, and could alleviate agricultural drought in the region. The spatial impacts of the reservoir on regional climate change were significant, while the influence of ENSO could not be observed at the station scale.
Although El Nino-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) has been widely confirmed to have significant impacts on climate change in Asia, it is unknown whether the climate change in the Yangtze River Basin (YTR basin) is related to the operation of the Three Gorges Reservoir, which is the world's largest hydropower station. In this study, we used the Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI) as an indicator of climate change and found that the mutation period of the YTR basin was 2003-2006 based on three mutation tests. By analyzing the trends of the SPEI and five related meteorological factors before and after 2003, it was found that the construction of the Three Gorges Reservoir increased the relative humidity and provided a more humid climate for the downstream basin. The relationships between drought events and ENSO and the water level of the reservoir indicated that the basin was more prone to drought in El Nino years and the Three Gorges Reservoir could alleviate agricultural drought in the downstream basin. The spatial impacts of the Three Gorges Reservoir on regional climate change were more pronounced, while the impact of ENSO could not be reflected at the station scale.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据