4.7 Article

Feasibility of machine learning methods for predicting hospital emergency room visits for respiratory diseases

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 28, 期 23, 页码 29701-29709

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-12658-7

关键词

PM2; 5 exposure; Respiratory diseases; Emergency room visits; Machine learning

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41771380]
  2. Key Special Project for Introduced Talents Team of Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory [GML2019ZD0301]
  3. GDAS' Project of Science and Technology Development [2020GDASYL-20200103003]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2020M682628]
  5. State Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Information System

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study examines the feasibility of machine learning methods for predicting daily ERV of respiratory diseases in urban areas of Beijing. Results show that ARIMA performs the worst, while MLP and LSTM perform better, with LSTM showing strong capability in describing and predicting the relationship between PM2.5 pollution and respiratory disease infection.
The prediction of hospital emergency room visits (ERV) for respiratory diseases after the outbreak of PM2.5 is of great importance in terms of public health, medical resource allocation, and policy decision support. Recently, the machine learning methods bring promising solutions for ERV prediction in view of their powerful ability of short-term forecasting, while their performances still exist unknown. Therefore, we aim to check the feasibility of machine learning methods for ERV prediction of respiratory diseases. Three different machine learning models, including autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA), multilayer perceptron (MLP), and long short-term memory (LSTM), are introduced to predict daily ERV in urban areas of Beijing, and their performances are evaluated in terms of the mean absolute error (MAE), root mean squared error (RMSE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), and coefficient of determination (R-2). The results show that the performance of ARIMA is the worst, with a maximum R-2 of 0.70 and minimum MAE, RMSE, and MAPE of 99, 124, and 26.56, respectively, while MLP and LSTM perform better, with a maximum R-2 of 0.80 (0.78) and corresponding MAE, RMSE, and MAPE of 49 (33), 62 (42), and 14.14 (9.86). In addition, it demonstrates that MLP cannot detect the time lag effect properly, while LSTM does well in the description and prediction of exposure-response relationship between PM2.5 pollution and infecting respiratory disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据