4.7 Article

Organic composition of epilithic biofilms from agricultural and urban watershed in South Brazil

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 28, 期 22, 页码 28808-28824

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-11389-5

关键词

Environment; Anthropic activities; Epilithic biofilms; Chemical composition; Functional groups; Spectrometric techniques

资金

  1. Mais Agua of FINEP/FEPAGRO
  2. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq, Brazil) [309515/2015-7]
  3. FAPERGS [19/2551-0001641-7]
  4. Region Nouvelle Aquitaine (France)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The active functional groups in epilithic biofilms, including polysaccharides, nitrogen-containing compounds, lipids, and aromatic and phenolic structures with characteristic functional groups, such as alcohols, esters, ethers, and amides, were identified. These components can effectively reflect environmental pressures.
Active functional groups in biofilms determine the adsorption and desorption of contaminants and nutrients. Epilithic biofilms were characterized in order to understand the association between the chemistry alteration patterns and the surrounding anthropic activities of the Guapore River watershed. The instrumental analyses included pyrolysis coupled to gas chromatography and mass spectroscopy, spectroscopy in the IR region with attenuated total reflectance, and two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance. Spectrometric techniques demonstrated that epilithic biofilms are mainly composed of polysaccharides, nitrogen-containing compounds, lipids, and aromatic and phenolic structures, which have functional groups characteristic of alcohols, esters, ethers, and amides. The polysaccharide levels reflect well the environmental pressures. The chemical composition of epilithic biofilms can be an effective tool for environmental assessment in watercourses, since the different anthropic actions developed in watersheds, mainly agriculture and urban areas, can modify the organic fraction of biofilms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据