4.8 Article

Incubation in Wastewater Reduces the Multigenerational Effects of Microplastics in Daphnia magna

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 55, 期 4, 页码 2491-2499

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c07911

关键词

-

资金

  1. German Federal Ministry for Education and Research [02WRS1378I, 03F0789D]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research shows that the aging of microplastics in the environment can affect their toxicity to organisms, with the adsorption of dissolved organic matter being a key process in reducing the toxicity of microplastics.
The aging of microplastics in the environment changes their physicochemical properties. While this may affect their toxicity, comparative data on the effects of aged compared to pristine microplastics are scarce. One of those aging processes is the sorption of chemicals, which has mainly been studied for individual pollutants present in marine ecosystems. To investigate how the sorption of a complex mixture of freshwater pollutants affects the toxicity of microplastics, we incubated irregular polystyrene particles (<= 63 mu m) in either wastewater or ultrapure water. We exposed Daphnia magna to these aged microplastics and their pristine counterparts (80, 400, 2000, and 10,000 particles mL(-1)) over four generations using food limitation as an additional, environmentally realistic stressor. Both particle types affect the survival, reproduction, adult and neonate body lengths, and growth. An exposure to pristine microplastics results in the extinction of the third generation of daphnids. In contrast, wastewater-incubated particles induced a lower mortality. The incubation with wastewater does not change the microplastics' size, surface charge, and structure. Consistent with the literature, we assume that the adsorption of dissolved organic matter is a key aging process reducing the toxicity of microplastics. Consequently, toxicity testing using pristine microplastics may overestimate the effects of plastic particles in nature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据