4.7 Article

A rapid assessment framework for food system shocks: Lessons learned from COVID-19 in the Indo-Pacific region

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY
卷 117, 期 -, 页码 34-45

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.12.011

关键词

Agriculture; Food security; Maladaptation; Recovery potential; Resilience; Transformation

资金

  1. ACIAR Small Research Activity [CS/2020/146]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The frequency and severity of shocks to food systems are increasing globally, exacerbated by events like the current COVID-19 outbreak. Rapid assessments can help identify priority interventions by integrating diverse knowledge and data, but also come with risks and challenges that need to be addressed.
The frequency and severity of shocks to food systems is accelerating globally, exemplified by the current COVID19 outbreak. In lowand middle-income countries, the impacts have exacerbated existing food system vulnerabilities and poverty. Governments and donors must respond quickly, but few tools are available that identify interventions to build food system resilience, or emerging opportunities for transformation. In this paper we reflect on the application of a systems-based rapid assessment which we applied across 11 Indo-Pacific countries in May-July 2020. Our approach was shaped by three design parameters: the integration of key informants' perspectives engaged remotely within the countries, applicability to diverse food systems and COVID-19 experiences across the region, and the consideration of food systems as complex systems. For the rapid assessment we adopted an analytical framework proposed by Allen and Prosperi (2016). To include a development lens, we added the analysis of vulnerable groups and their exposure, impacts, recovery potential and resilience, and pro poor interventions. We concluded that the framework and approach facilitated integration and triangulation of disparate knowledge types and data to identify priority interventions and was sufficiently flexible to be applied across food systems, at both national, sub-national and commodity scales. The step-wise method was simple and enabled structured inquiry and reporting. Although the systems concepts appeared more easily transferrable to key informants in some countries than others, potentially transformational interventions were identified, and also some risks of maladaptation. We present a refined framework that emphasises analysis of political, economic and institutional drivers of exposure and vulnerability, the constraints that they pose for building recovery potential and resilience, and trade-offs amongst winners and losers inherent in proposed interventions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据