4.7 Article

Topography not tenure controls extent of wildfire within Mountain Ash forests

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 16, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/abe57e

关键词

wildfire; bushfire; topography; water availability; land tenure; sustainability

资金

  1. Australian Research Council
  2. Bushfire and Natural Hazard Cooperative Research Centre

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that topographic wetness is the major determinant of the extent of fire in Mountain Ash forests in the Central Highlands of Victoria, Australia. Wetter areas, favored by protected tenures such as National Parks, experienced less fire damage compared to areas with multiple uses like State Forests. Topographic controls on water availability and droughts will continue to influence fire extent and likelihood in these forests.
Two high intensity wildfire events, 70 years apart, burnt large areas of Mountain Ash forests in the Central Highlands, Victoria, Australia. Both resulted in Royal Commissions (the strongest form of judicial inquiry in Australia) as to their cause(s) owing to large losses of life and property. Here we tested the hypothesis that site 'wetness'-determined using a Topographic Wetness Index-is a major determinant of the extent of fire (% of sample points that burnt) within high intensity wildfire events and across tenures. We show that wetness dominated the extent of fire in these forests in both the 1939 and 2009 wildfire events. Mountain Ash forests are now strongly skewed in their distribution, with wetter and older forests favored by protected tenures (e.g. National Parks) designed to meet needs for water and conservation. In 2009, the extent of fire at the stand scale in water catchments and conservation tenures was twice that in 1939. In land tenures with multiple uses (e.g. State Forests), the extent of fire was one-third less in 2009 than it was in 1939. Topographic controls on water availability, and major droughts, will likely continue to dominate the extent and likelihood of fire in these forests.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据