4.7 Article

Improved ANFIS model for forecasting Wuhan City Air Quality and analysis COVID-19 lockdown impacts on air quality

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
卷 194, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.110607

关键词

Air quality index; ANFIS; PSO; SMA; COVID-19; Time series predection; Wuhan

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2019YFB1405600]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, an improved version of ANFIS called PSOSMA-ANFIS was proposed for forecasting the air quality index in Wuhan City, using a hybrid optimization method combining Slime mould algorithm (SMA) and particle swarm optimizer (PSO) which showed superior performance compared to other algorithms. The study also analyzed the impact of the lockdown on air quality, concluding significant decreases in PM2.5, CO2, SO2, and NO2 concentrations during the lockdown period.
In this study, we propose an improved version of the adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) for forecasting the air quality index in Wuhan City, China. We propose a hybrid optimization method to improve ANFIS performance, called PSOSMA, using a new modified meta-heuristics (MH) algorithm, Slime mould algorithm (SMA), which is improved by using the particle swarm optimizer (PSO). The proposed PSOSMA-ANFIS has been trained with air quality index time series data of three years and has been applied to forecast the fine particulate matter (PM2.5), sulfur dioxide (SO2), carbon dioxide (CO2), and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) for one year. We also compared the proposed PSOSMA to other MH algorithms used to train ANFIS. We found that the modified ANFIS using PSOSMA achieved better performance than compared algorithms. Moreover, we analyzed the impacts of the lockdown of Wuhan City on the concentrations of PM2.5, NO2, CO2, and SO2. We compared the correspondence period with previous years, and we concluded that there are significant decreases in the concentrations of PM2.5, CO2, SO2, and NO2.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据