4.7 Article

A benchmark dose analysis for urinary cadmium and type 2 diabetes mellitus

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
卷 273, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116519

关键词

Benchmark dose; Urinary cadmium; Type 2 diabetes mellitus; NHANES

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFC1801204]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research has revealed a strong positive association between urinary cadmium levels and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), although the corresponding threshold has not yet been established. Benchmark dose analysis based on population data showed that the risk of T2DM associated with urinary cadmium levels is low and should be considered in the development of regulatory limits for safe exposure to cadmium.
Cadmium (Cd) is a heavy metal referred to as one of the environmental endocrine disruptors. The dose-dependent association between Cd and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has been elucidated, but the corresponding threshold has not been established. To evaluate the urinary Cd levels associated with T2DM, we perform a benchmark dose (BMD) analysis based on data from the 1999-2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Weighted datasets were generated by the inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis to develop the robustness of our analysis. We inferred a strong positive association between urinary Cd and T2DM in unweighted and weighted populations. BMD and its low limit (BMDL) estimates for 5% benchmark responses (BMR) was 0.297 (0.198) and 0.190 (0.178) mu g/g creatinine for each population, respectively. The sensitivity analysis by race, followed by weight of sum method showed similar estimates of urinary Cd level for the risk of developing T2DM, which are rather low and far less than those for the renal or bone disease development risk. This indicates that T2DM can be a sensitive outcome of Cd exposure and therefore should be taken into account in the development of standard regulatory limits for safe exposure to Cd. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据