4.7 Article

Mapping soil pollution by using drone image recognition and machine learning at an arsenic-contaminated agricultural field

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
卷 270, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.116281

关键词

Arsenic contamination; Soil pollution; HRAI; Remote sensing; Machine learning

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [42077118]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2019YFC1804900]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel method combining high-resolution aerial imaging and machine learning algorithms was proposed to map soil contamination, showing better performance than traditional Kriging interpolation. The study demonstrated the potential of using HRAI combined with machine learning to predict soil risk levels.
Mapping soil contamination enables the delineation of areas where protection measures are needed. Traditional soil sampling on a grid pattern followed by chemical analysis and geostatistical interpolation methods (GIMs), such as Kriging interpolation, can be costly, slow and not well-suited to highly heterogeneous soil environments. Here we propose a novel method to map soil contamination by combining high-resolution aerial imaging (HRAI) with machine learning algorithms. To support model establishment and validation, 1068 soil samples were collected from an arsenic (As) contaminated area in Zhongxiang, Hubei province, China. The average arsenic concentration was 39.88 mg/kg (SD = 213.70 mg/kg), with individual sample points determined as low risk (66.9%), medium risk (29.4%), or high risk (3.7%), respectively. Then, identified features were extracted from a HRAI image of the study area. Four machine learning algorithms were developed to predict As risk levels, including (i) support vector machine (SVM), (ii) multi-layer perceptron (MLP), (iii) random forest (RF), and (iii) extreme random forest (ERF). Among these, we found that the ERF algorithm performed best overall and that its prediction performance was generally better than that of traditional Kriging interpolation. The accuracy of ERF in test area 1 reached 0.87, performing better than RF (0.81), MLP (0.78) and SVM (0.77). The F1-score of ERF for discerning high-risk points in test area 1 was as high as 0.8. The complexity of the distribution of points with different risk levels was a decisive factor in model prediction ability. Identified features in the study area associated with fertilizer factories had the most important contribution to the ERF model. This study demonstrates that HRAI combined with machine learning has good potential to predict As soil risk levels. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据