4.7 Review

Phytotoxicity and bioconcentration of microcystins in agricultural plants: Meta-analysis and risk assessment

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
卷 272, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115966

关键词

-

资金

  1. China Scholarship Council
  2. Graduate Mobility Award from McGill University
  3. EcotoQ network - Fonds de recherche du Quebec - Nature et technologies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microcystins are highly phytotoxic to durum wheat, corn, white mustard, and garden cress, while leafy vegetables may bioconcentrate more microcystins in their edible parts. Human health risks from ingesting microcystins may be greater for leafy vegetables, but further research is needed to confirm bioconcentration levels in realistic environments.
Microcystins are cyanotoxins produced by many species of cyanobacteria. They are specific inhibitors of serine/threonine protein phosphatases and are phytotoxic to agricultural plants. This study used a formal meta-analysis to estimate the phytotoxicity and bioconcentration rates of agricultural plants exposed to microcystins, and the human health risk from consuming microcystin-contaminated plants. Among the 35 agricultural plants investigated, microcystins were most phytotoxic to durum wheat, corn, white mustard and garden cress. Leafy vegetables such as dill, parsley and cabbage could bioconcentrate similar to 3 times more microcystins in their edible parts than other agricultural plants. Although the human health risk from ingesting microcystins could be greater for leafy vegetables than other agricultural plants, further work is needed to confirm bioconcentration of microcystins in realistic water-soil-plant environments. Still, we should avoid growing leafy vegetables, durum wheat and corn on agricultural land that is irrigated with microcystins-contaminated water and be attentive to the risk of microcystins contamination in the agricultural food supply. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据