4.7 Article

Augmented Normalized Difference Water Index for improved surface water monitoring

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE
卷 140, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.105030

关键词

Satellite water mapping; Spectral index; MNDWI; AWEI; WI; Landsat

资金

  1. CUAHSI
  2. National Science Foundation (NSF) [EAR-1849458]
  3. U.S. Geological Survey's Land Change Science Program
  4. U.S. Geological Survey

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study provides a critical review of satellite remote sensing water indices and introduces a novel Augmented Normalized Difference Water Index (ANDWI) that utilizes an expanded set of spectral bands and dynamic thresholding. The ANDWI with Otsu-thresholding outperformed other indices in terms of overall accuracy. Additionally, a new cloud filtering algorithm and a Google Earth Engine App were developed to improve the accuracy and efficiency of water body delineation.
We present a comprehensive critical review of well-established satellite remote sensing water indices and offer a novel, robust Augmented Normalized Difference Water Index (ANDWI). ANDWI employs an expanded set of spectral bands, RGB, NIR, and SWIR1-2, to maximize the contrast between water and non-water pixels. Further, we implement a dynamic thresholding method, the Otsu algorithm, to enhance ANDWI?s performance. Applied to a variety of environmental conditions, ANDWI with Otsu-thresholding offered the highest overall accuracy (accuracy = 0.98, F1 = 0.98, and Kappa = 0.96) compared to other indices (NDWI, MNDWI, AWEI, WI). We also propose a novel cloud filtering algorithm that substantially increases the number of useable images compared to the conventional cloud-free composites (124% increased observations in the studied area) and resolves inappropriate masking of water bodies and hot sands as clouds by conventional methods. Finally, we develop a Google Earth Engine App to readily delineate 16-day surface water bodies across the globe.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据