4.6 Article

Proteomics insights into the Burkholderia cenocepacia phosphorus stress response

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 23, 期 9, 页码 5069-5086

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.15451

关键词

-

资金

  1. BBSRC MIBTP [BB/M01116X/1]
  2. MRC
  3. BBSRC [BB/M01116X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Burkholderia cepacia complex consists of opportunistic pathogens that cause high mortality rates in cystic fibrosis patients. In response to phosphate limitation, a crucial environmental stress, differentially regulated proteins were identified in the cellular and extracellular proteome of B. cenocepacia. This study provides insight into the metabolic shifts in Burkholderia under phosphorus stress, with implications for further research in understanding the biology of these bacteria.
The Burkholderia cepacia complex is a group of Burkholderia species that are opportunistic pathogens causing high mortality rates in patients with cystic fibrosis. An environmental stress often encountered by these soil-dwelling and pathogenic bacteria is phosphorus limitation, an essential element for cellular processes. Here, we describe cellular and extracellular proteins differentially regulated between phosphate-deplete (0 mM, no added phosphate) and phosphate-replete (1 mM) growth conditions using a comparative proteomics (LC-MS/MS) approach. We observed a total of 128 and 65 unique proteins were downregulated and upregulated respectively, in the B. cenocepacia proteome. Of those downregulated proteins, many have functions in amino acid transport/metabolism. We have identified 24 upregulated proteins that are directly/indirectly involved in inorganic phosphate or organic phosphorus acquisition. Also, proteins involved in virulence and antimicrobial resistance were differentially regulated, suggesting B. cenocepacia experiences a dramatic shift in metabolism under these stress conditions. Overall, this study provides a baseline for further research into the biology of Burkholderia in response to phosphorus stress.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据