4.6 Article

RNA release via membrane vesicles in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 is associated with the growth phase

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 23, 期 9, 页码 5030-5041

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.15436

关键词

-

资金

  1. Government of Spain [CTQ2014-59632-R]
  2. Austrian Science Fund [P28711-B22, RNA-REG F43, AF4311]
  3. APIF fellowship from the University of Barcelona
  4. EMBO Short-Term fellowship [7007]
  5. FEMS [FEMS-RG2016-0098]
  6. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P28711] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Studies on Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 membrane vesicles (MVs) have shown that the externalization of RNA via MVs mainly occurs during the late exponential phase, suggesting the secretion of different types of MVs during growth processes.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 membrane vesicles (MVs) are known to play a role in cell-to-cell communication. Several studies have shown that the MV composition and physicochemical properties vary according to the bacterial growth stage, but the impact this might have on the externalization of RNA via MVs has not been addressed. Therefore, a study to characterize the RNA content from MVs retrieved at different growth phases was conducted. First, the transcriptome analyses revealed a higher abundance of around 300 RNA species in MVs when compared with the cells. The vesiculation rate along the growth curve was determined, showing that the release of MVs increased during the transition to the stationary phase, whereas it decreased in the late stationary phase. RNA-seq of MVs retrieved along the transition to the stationary phase demonstrated that the RNA cargo of vesicles did not vary. However, the amount of smaller RNAs (<200 nt) inside MVs retrieved in the late exponential phase was higher than in the stationary phase MVs. These results indicate that the externalization of RNA via MVs occurs during late exponential phase and implies the secretion of different types of MVs during growth.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据