4.6 Article

Hydrochemistry of groundwater from Tocumen sector, Panama city: an assessment of its possible usage during emergency events

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES
卷 80, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-021-09497-7

关键词

Groundwater; Rainwater; Hydrochemical study; Water security; Panama

资金

  1. National Secretary of Science and Technology (SENACYT)
  2. Institute for the Training and Use of Human Resources (IFARHU) of Panama [270-2019-109]
  3. Fondos para Grupos de Investigacion UCLM [2019-GRIN-27011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper presents an exploratory investigation on the quality of groundwater in the southeastern part of the Province of Panama. Most parameters in the analyzed groundwater meet the Panamanian drinking water standard, indicating it is suitable for purification. However, caution should be taken for other uses due to medium risk of soil salinization for irrigation water and moderate hardness for industrial uses.
In Panama City, the water supply sources for the population come mainly from surface waters, but in times of drought and extreme natural phenomena, the need to resort to underground sources is explored. This paper concerns an exploratory investigation with the aim of assessing the quality of groundwater in the southeastern part of the Province of Panama and to determine its possible use as drinking water during extreme natural phenomena. Monthly monitoring over a period of 15 months was carried out. The study included the sampling and analysis of groundwater by different physic-chemical, hydrochemical and biological parameters. The results showed that most of the parameters in the analysed groundwater conformed to the Panamanian drinking water norm and the water potability diagram, this is a convenient source of raw water for purification. As for other uses for this water source, it should be used with caution since it represents a medium risk of soil salinization for irrigation water; and it is a moderately hard water for industrial uses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据