4.7 Article

SARS-CoV-2 is rapidly inactivated at high temperature

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
卷 19, 期 2, 页码 1773-1777

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10311-021-01187-x

关键词

SARS-CoV-2; Coronavirus; COVID-19; Environmental decay; Heat; Viral inactivation

资金

  1. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Science and Technology Directorate (ST) [HSHQDC-15-C-00064]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the environmental stability of SARS-CoV-2 in a clinically relevant matrix dried onto stainless steel at a high temperature. The results showed that at 54.5 degrees C, the virus half-life was approximately 10.8 minutes and the time for a 90% decrease in infectivity was about 35.4 minutes. This suggests that in environments with temperatures reaching at least 54.5 degrees C, such as in vehicle interior cabins, the potential exposure to infectious virus on surfaces could be substantially reduced in under an hour.
In the absence of a vaccine, preventing the spread of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the primary means to reduce the impact of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Multiple studies have reported the presence of SARS-CoV-2 genetic material on surfaces suggesting that fomite transmission of SARS-CoV-2 is feasible. High temperature inactivation of virus has been previously suggested, but not shown. In the present study, we investigated the environmental stability of SARS-CoV-2 in a clinically relevant matrix dried onto stainless steel at a high temperature. The results show that at 54.5 degrees C, the virus half-life was 10.8 +/- 3.0 min and the time for a 90% decrease in infectivity was 35.4 +/- 9.0 min. These findings suggest that in instances where the environment can reach temperatures of at least 54.5 degrees C, such as in vehicle interior cabins when parked in warmer ambient air, that the potential for exposure to infectious virus on surfaces could be decreased substantially in under an hour.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据