4.7 Article

A first order finite similitude approach to scaled aseismic structures

期刊

ENGINEERING STRUCTURES
卷 231, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111739

关键词

Finite similitude; Aseismic structures; Dimensional analysis; Earthquakes; Scaled experimentation

资金

  1. Ministry of National Education in Turkey
  2. Department of Civil Engineering at Firat University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper discusses the limitations of scaled experiments in earthquake-resistant structure design and introduces a new theory based on space scaling to address scale effects more effectively. Unlike traditional dimensional analysis, the finite similitude approach incorporates scale effects and links experiments at multiple scales to reconstruct full-scale behavior.
For many decades the designs of earthquake-resistant (aseismic) structures have been influenced by scaled experiments, underpinned by the theory of dimensional analysis. Although scaled experiments still play an important role, they are recognised to suffer shortcomings, which are particularly severe when scaling ratios are pronounced. The issue is one of scale effects and the inability of dimensional analysis to offer any solution in their presence. This paper is concerned with a new theory for the analysis of aseismic structures that is founded on the metaphysical concept of space scaling, where beams, substructures or buildings etc. are contracted through the mechanism of space contraction. Although space contraction is evidently practically impossible the theory describes the effects of such a process on the underpinning governing mechanics involved. Unlike dimensional analysis the approach which is termed finite similitude embraces scale effects and accounts for them by linking experiments at more than one scale. It is demonstrated in this work how it is possible to reconstruct full-scale behaviour by means of two scaled experiments of a selected beam, column and multi-storey structure when subjected to dynamic loading conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据