4.7 Article

An integrated framework for modelling time-dependent corrosion propagation in offshore concrete structures

期刊

ENGINEERING STRUCTURES
卷 228, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111482

关键词

Corrosion propagation; Integrated framework; Multiphysical modelling; Numerical analysis; Offshore structure; Reinforced concrete

资金

  1. Australian Research Council [DP160103919, IH150100006]
  2. Australian Government

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reinforcement corrosion in offshore concrete structures is a critical durability issue, with corrosion propagation governed by various environmental conditions. A novel numerical framework has been developed in this study to effectively predict time-dependent corrosion propagation, showing potential versatility in modern offshore civil engineering through thorough numerical validation.
Reinforcement corrosion is an enduring durability issue essential to the designs and maintenances of diverse offshore concrete structures. The corrosion propagation can be triggered and governed by a variety of environmental conditions, which is a complex process comprising the stages from time-dependent concrete decay during the initiation phase to the active corrosion phase. Misinterpretations and/or oversimplifications, due to difficulties in numerical modelling, on either phase would greatly impair the robustness of the estimation on corrosion rate. In this study, a novel numerical framework, integrating the chemo-physical-mechanical and electrochemical modelling techniques, is freshly developed to effectively address the conundrum in predicting time-dependent corrosion propagation. The developed framework is actively validated against a variety of experimental problems, where both long-term microcell and macrocell corrosions, as well as corrosions triggered under various sources are considered. The numerical studies thoroughly demonstrate the potential versatility of the proposed method in modern offshore civil engineering.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据