4.7 Article

Development of a mixed mode double cantilever beam specimen for the fracture characterization of adhesives under high displacement rate

期刊

ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS
卷 242, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.107467

关键词

Adhesive joint; Dynamic loading; Mixed mode; Fracture toughness; Beam theory

资金

  1. French national research programme PRC MECACOMP
  2. French National Association of Technical Research ANRT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new specimen called mixed mode double cantilever beam (MMDCB) was developed for characterizing the mixed mode fracture of adhesives under high displacement rates. The results showed that the MMDCB specimen provided consistent evaluations of mixed mode fracture toughness under quasi-static loading and asymmetric high displacement rate. The corrected beam theory with effective crack length was proven to accurately determine the mixed mode fracture toughness up to a displacement rate of 1 m/s.
In this paper, a new specimen called mixed mode double cantilever beam (MMDCB) was developed for the mixed mode fracture characterization of adhesives under high displacement rates. The MMDCB specimen was designed using finite elements simulations in order to determine the fracture toughness for a mode mixity in the plane I+II+III. Firstly, results from MMDCB specimens tested under quasi-static loading were experimentally compared to a reference single leg bending test. The test results, obtained with the two different specimens, exhibit consistent evaluations of the mixed mode fracture toughness. Secondly, the MMDCB specimen testing under asymmetric high displacement rate was validated through explicit simulations. The corrected beam theory with effective crack length was extended to the analysis of MMDCB specimens tested under high displacement rate. It was numerically proved to accurately determine the mixed mode fracture toughness under a displacement rate up to 1 m/s.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据