4.7 Article

An incident of water and soil gushing in a metro tunnel due to high water pressure in sandy silt

期刊

ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS
卷 121, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.105196

关键词

Tunnelling; Water and soil gushing; Remedial measures; Monitoring

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52090082, 51978517, 41772295]
  2. Innovation Program of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission [2019-01-07-00-07-456 E00051]
  3. key innovation team program of innovation talents promotion plan by MOST of China [2016RA4059]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper discusses an incident of water and soil gushing during the construction of a connecting passage of Metro Line 18 in Shanghai, analyzing the causes, damage, and effectiveness of remedial measures. Remedial measures including grouting and lining reinforcement with reinforced steel ring improved the stability of the tunnel structures.
A connecting passage of the Metro Line 18 in Shanghai was under construction in a sand layer featuring high fine content and a high level of confined water head. During the tunnel construction, an incident of water and soil gushing through the freezing holes resulted in large settlement and damage to the tunnel linings. The remedial measures were then carried out to prevent the incident and to strengthen the damaged tunnel linings. This paper analyzes the reasons for the water and soil gushing, the damage to the tunnels, and the effect of the remedial measures. The main reason for the incident was water and sand penetration through the gap between the freezing pipes and the borehole orifice pipes due to the high water pressure outside the tunnels. The monitoring results indicate that the grouting and the lining reinforcement with reinforced steel ring effectively improved the stability of the tunnel structures. This case study provides practical experience and guidance for similar tunnelling projects in the future to mitigate the risk of water and soil gushing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据