4.7 Article

Multi-agent hierarchical policy gradient for Air Combat Tactics emergence via self-play

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engappai.2020.104112

关键词

Air combat; Artificial intelligence; Multi-agent reinforcement learning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The researchers proposed a novel Multi-Agent Hierarchical Policy Gradient algorithm (MAHPG), capable of learning various strategies and surpassing expert cognition through adversarial self-play learning. The algorithm adopts a hierarchical decision network to handle complex and hybrid actions, similar to human decision-making ability, effectively reducing action ambiguity. Experimental results demonstrate that MAHPG excels in defense and offense ability compared to state-of-the-art air combat methods.
Air-to-air confrontation has attracted wide attention from artificial intelligence scholars. However, in the complex air combat process, operational strategy selection depends heavily on aviation expert knowledge, which is usually expensive and difficult to obtain. Moreover, it is challenging to select optimal action sequences efficiently and accurately with existing methods, due to the high complexity of action selection when involving hybrid actions, e.g., discrete/continuous actions. In view of this, we propose a novel Multi-Agent Hierarchical Policy Gradient algorithm (MAHPG), which is capable of learning various strategies and transcending expert cognition by adversarial self-play learning. Besides, a hierarchical decision network is adopted to deal with the complicated and hybrid actions. It has a hierarchical decision-making ability similar to humankind, and thus, reduces the action ambiguity efficiently. Extensive experimental results demonstrate that the MAHPG outperforms the state-of-the-art air combat methods in terms of both defense and offense ability. Notably, it is discovered that the MAHPG has the ability of Air Combat Tactics Interplay Adaptation, and new operational strategies emerged that surpass the level of experts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据