4.7 Article

Fabrication of a Z-Scheme Heterojunction Polyhedral-Shaped BiOIO3/MIL-53(Fe) Photocatalyst for Enhancing Gaseous Hg-0 Removal

期刊

ENERGY & FUELS
卷 35, 期 4, 页码 3252-3265

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c03376

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52076126]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai [18ZR1416200]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A Z-scheme heterojunction polyhedral-shaped BiOIO3/MIL-53(Fe) photocatalyst was prepared by a solvothermal method, showing improved vapor-phase mercury removal efficiency compared to MIL-53(Fe). The optimal molar ratio of BiOIO3 and MIL-53(Fe) was found to be 2:1, reaching a Hg-0 removal efficiency of 74.19%. The proposed photocatalytic oxidation mechanism of Hg-0 by the BiOIO3/MIL-53(Fe) composite paves the way for further study on the electron transport channels between binary photocatalyst materials.
A Z-scheme heterojunction polyhedral-shaped BiOIO3/MIL-53(Fe) photocatalyst is prepared by a solvothermal method. The samples are characterized by XRD, XPS, SEM, TEM, FT-IR, UV-vis, PL, and other material characterization analysis methods. The photocatalytic performance of photocatalysts is studied for removal of vapor-phase mercury (Hg-0) under visible-light irradiation. The results suggest that the Hg-0 removal efficiency of the BiOIO3/MIL-53(Fe) composite is significantly improved compared with that of MIL-53(Fe). When the molar ratio of BiOIO3 and MIL-53(Fe) is 2:1, the BiOIO3/MIL-53(Fe) composite photocatalyst exhibits the best Hg-0 removal efficiency, reaching 74.19%. BiOIO3 and MIL-53(Fe) form a Z-scheme heterojunction with a suitable energy band structure, which results in the effective separation of photoinduced electron-hole pairs and delays their recombination. Finally, the photocatalytic oxidation mechanism of Hg-0 by the BiOIO3/MIL-53(Fe) composite is proposed, which paves the way for the study of the built-in electric field and electron transport channels between binary photocatalyst materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据