4.7 Article

Production of alternative marine fuels in Brazil: An integrated assessment perspective

期刊

ENERGY
卷 219, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.119444

关键词

International shipping; Integrated assessment modelling; Alternative fuels

资金

  1. Brazilian Coordination of Superior Level Staff Improvement (CAPES)
  2. Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq)
  3. Brazilian philanthropic organization Institute for Climate and Society (iCS)
  4. NAVIGATE project of the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program [821124]
  5. European Union's DG CLIMA [21020701/2017/770447/SER/CLIMA.C.1 EuropeAid/138417/DH/SER/MulitOC]
  6. European Union's EuropeAid [21020701/2017/770447/SER/CLIMA.C.1 EuropeAid/138417/DH/SER/MulitOC]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study provides an IAM perspective on the production and distribution of alternative marine fuels in Brazilian ports, in line with the IMO2050 emission reduction target. It highlights the potential drawbacks of achieving the IMO2050 goal without considering a national decarbonization strategy, and emphasizes the need for an integrated mitigation strategy to effectively decarbonize the entire marine supply chain.
This study aims to provide an Integrated Assessment Model (IAM) perspective of the production and distribution of alternative marine fuels in Brazilian ports, considering the International Maritime Organization (IMO) emission reduction target for 2050 (IMO2050). Although other mitigation measures are available, it is likely that alternative fuels will be required, implying additional costs and entailing relevant impacts on other energy chains and land use. Hence, the national IAM BLUES model is adapted to represent the relevant part of the international shipping sector. A set of scenarios is developed considering different fuel alternatives, demand assumptions and national mitigation targets. Findings show that taking into account emissions of CO2 only or of all greenhouse gases (GHGs) within the IMO strategy significantly impacts the optimal technological portfolio. Furthermore, achieving the IMO2050 goal without considering a national decarbonization strategy may result in potential spillovers. The intense use of the energy sector could partially compromise the gains obtained by maritime decarbonization or even surpass it. Therefore, only an integrated mitigation strategy would lead to more effective decarbonization of the entire marine supply. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据