4.7 Article

Low-carbon economic dispatch of electricity-gas systems

期刊

ENERGY
卷 226, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.120267

关键词

Electricity-gas system; Carbon capture system; Carbon emission trading; Stochastic optimization; Uncertainties

资金

  1. Research and Demonstration on Key Technologies of Green and High Reliable Smart Distribution Networks in Huangguoshu Scenic Area [060400KK52190017]
  2. Sichuan Science and Technology Program [2021YFSY0053]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An investigation into a low-carbon economic dispatch model for electricity-gas systems, incorporating carbon capture systems, carbon emissions trading, demand response, and renewable generation. The study formulates the dispatch problem as a risk-constrained two-stage stochastic model and introduces a predefined confidence level to control risks associated with renewable generation and carbon emissions trading. Case studies demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed model.
A reasonable dispatch strategy is of significance to meet and balance the operation economy, carbon emission and operation risk requirements for energy systems. A low-carbon economic dispatch model for electricity-gas systems is proposed, in which the carbon capture systems (CCS), carbon emission trading (CET), demand response (DR) and renewable generation are considered. The impacts of different low-carbon technologies on system economy and carbon emission are investigated. To manage the risk caused by uncertain renewable generation and CET price, the low-carbon economic dispatch problem is formulated as a risk-constrained two-stage stochastic dispatch model based on the chance-constrained programming (CCP). A predefined confidence level is introduced to control the loss of load risk and the transmission line overload risk in the proposed model. Case studies demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed models. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据