4.7 Article

Toward hybrid approaches for wind turbine power curve modeling with balanced loss functions and local weighting schemes

期刊

ENERGY
卷 218, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.119478

关键词

Balanced loss function; Heteroscedastic data; Hybrid method; Theoretical power curve; Wind farm power; Wind turbine power curve

资金

  1. MITACS Canada
  2. Manitoba Hydro International Ltd.
  3. NSERC Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A hybrid estimation approach is proposed in this study to improve the accuracy of wind turbine power curve fitting, showing its effectiveness in enhancing the performance of existing methods.
Wind turbine power curves are often used for monitoring the performance of wind turbines and play an important role in wind power forecasting. Various factors such as age of turbines, installed location, air density, wind direction and measurement errors cause non-homogeneity among observed data, which often influences the accuracy of fitted power curves. To overcome this problem, a hybrid estimation approach is proposed, based on weighted balanced loss functions that account for both estimation error and goodness of fit by shrinking estimates toward standardized target models. Two different weighting schemes are developed to incorporate the non-homogeneity of data in the estimation process. The proposed algorithm is compared with commonly used power curve estimation methods based on classical least squares, natural splines, and local linear smoothing methods. The performance of the original and proposed hybrid methods is evaluated using a historical data set collected from a wind farm located in Canada. Results show that hybrid methods can be used as an effective tool to improve the performance of existing power curve modeling approaches. Consequently, proposed methods can facilitate more robust monitoring the performance of wind turbines as well as wind power forecasting. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据