4.5 Article

An Active Cascaded Battery Voltage Balancing Circuit Based on Multi-Winding Transformer with Small Magnetizing Inductance

期刊

ENERGIES
卷 14, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en14051302

关键词

active battery voltage balancing; battery management system; lithium-ion battery; multi-winding transformer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper introduces an active voltage balancing method for secondary batteries, utilizing a multi-winding transformer and an additional auxiliary circuit to overcome the limitations of passive balancing. The validity of the proposed circuit was confirmed through mode analysis and simulation, and waveforms demonstrating balancing performance under various conditions were provided, along with comparison results with traditional methods.
This paper covers the active voltage balancing method of secondary batteries. The number of applications using secondary batteries is increasing, and the batteries are normally connected in series/parallel to increase discharge cycle and power. The problem is that when there is a voltage imbalance between the cells or modules of a battery, there is a risk of an accident in the near-sighted way, shortening the life of the battery cells. Although this risk was prevented through passive balancing, this approach has limitations, including heat generation, long balancing time, and in the case of a battery that needs to be balanced between modules (or between stacks), its effectiveness decreases. Therefore, in this paper, an active cell balancing method that can overcome the limitations mentioned before is proposed. The proposed method uses a multi-winding transformer, and to increase the power density, the magnetizing inductance is decreased, and an auxiliary circuit is added. The validity of the proposed circuit was verified through mode analysis and simulation. In addition, waveforms showing the balancing performance under various conditions and the comparison results between conventional and proposed methods are given.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据