4.5 Article

Emission Characteristics for Swirl Methane-Air Premixed Flames with Ammonia Addition

期刊

ENERGIES
卷 14, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en14030662

关键词

swirl flames; ammonia; NO emission modelling; reactor network; CH4; NH3 flame; NH3 combustion process

资金

  1. National Science Centre, Poland [2018/29/N/ST8/01671]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents the experimental and numerical analysis of a combustion process for atmospheric swirl burners using methane with added ammonia as fuel. The results show that the NO emissions are influenced by the ammonia content and outflow angle, while variations in power have little impact on the overall emissions.
This paper details the experimental and numerical analysis of a combustion process for atmospheric swirl burners using methane with added ammonia as fuel. The research was carried out for lean methane-air mixtures, which were doped with ammonia up to 5% and preheated up to 473 K. A flow with internal recirculation was induced by burners with different outflow angles from swirling blades, 30 degrees and 50 degrees, where tested equivalence ratio was 0.71. The NO and CO distribution profiles on specified axial positions of the combustor and the overall emission levels at the combustor outlet were measured and compared to a modelled outcome. The highest values of the NO emissions were collected for 5% NH3 and 50 degrees (1950 ppmv), while a reduction to 1585 ppmv was observed at 30 degrees. The doubling of the firing rates from 15 kW up to 30 kW did not have any great influence on the overall emissions. The emission trend lines were not proportional to the raising share of the ammonia in the fuel. 3D numerical tests and a kinetic study with a reactor network showed that the NO outlet concentration for swirl flame depended on the recirculation ratio, residence time, wall temperature, and the mechanism used. Those parameters need to be carefully defined in order to get highly accurate NO predictions-both for 3D simulations and simplified reactor-based models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据