4.5 Article

Contribution of chemotherapy mobilization to disease control in multiple myeloma treated with autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation

期刊

BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION
卷 50, 期 12, 页码 1513-1518

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2015.190

关键词

-

资金

  1. Public Health Service Grant/National Cancer Institute (NCI) [U24-CA076518]
  2. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
  3. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
  4. NHLBI [5U10HL069294]
  5. NCI
  6. Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA/DHHS) [HHSH250201200016C]
  7. Office of Naval Research [N00014-13-1-0039, N00014-14-1-0028]
  8. Actinium Pharmaceuticals
  9. Allos Therapeutics, Inc.
  10. Amgen, Inc.
  11. Ariad
  12. Be the Match Foundation
  13. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association
  14. Celgene Corporation
  15. Chimerix, Inc.
  16. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
  17. Fresenius-Biotech North America, Inc.
  18. Gamida Cell Teva Joint Venture Ltd.
  19. Genentech, Inc.
  20. Gentium SpA
  21. Genzyme Corporation
  22. GlaxoSmithKline
  23. Health Research, Inc. Roswell Park Cancer Institute
  24. HistoGenetics, Inc.
  25. Incyte Corporation
  26. Jeff Gordon Children's Foundation
  27. Kiadis Pharma
  28. Leukemia & Lymphoma Society
  29. Medac GmbH
  30. Medical College of Wisconsin
  31. Merck Co, Inc.
  32. Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Co.
  33. Milliman USA, Inc.
  34. Miltenyi Biotec, Inc.
  35. National Marrow Donor Program
  36. Onyx Pharmaceuticals
  37. Optum Healthcare Solutions, Inc.
  38. Osiris Therapeutics, Inc.
  39. Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc.
  40. Perkin Elmer, Inc.
  41. Remedy Informatics
  42. Sanofi US
  43. Seattle Genetics
  44. Sigma-Tau Pharmaceuticals
  45. Soligenix, Inc.
  46. St. Baldrick's Foundation
  47. StemCyte, A Global Cord Blood Therapeutics Co.
  48. Stemsoft Software, Inc.
  49. Swedish Orphan Biovitrum
  50. Tarix Pharmaceuticals
  51. TerumoBCT
  52. Teva Neuroscience, Inc.
  53. THERAKOS, Inc.
  54. University of Minnesota
  55. University of Utah
  56. Wellpoint, Inc.
  57. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15K09591] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In patients with multiple myeloma (MM) undergoing autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT), peripheral blood progenitor cells may be collected following mobilization with growth factor alone (GF) or cytotoxic chemotherapy plus GF (CC+GF). It is uncertain whether the method of mobilization affects post-transplant outcomes. We compared these mobilization strategies in a retrospective analysis of 968 patients with MM from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database who received an auto-Ha in the US and Canada between 2007 and 2012. The kinetics of neutrophil engraftment (>= 0.5 x 10(9)/L) was similar between groups (13 vs 13 days, P=0.69) while platelet engraftment (>= 20 x 10(9)/L) was slightly faster with CC+GF (19 vs 18 days, P=0.006). Adjusted 3-year PFS was 43% (95% confidence interval (CI) 38-48) in GF and 40% (95% CI 35-45) in CC+GF, P=0.33. Adjusted 3-year OS was 82% (95% CI 78-86) vs 80% (95% CI 75-84), P=0.43 and adjusted 5-year OS was 62% (95% CI 54-68) vs 60% (95% CI 52-67), P=0.76, for GF and CC+GF, respectively. We conclude that MM patients undergoing auto-Ha have similar outcomes irrespective of the method of mobilization and found no evidence that the addition of chemotherapy to mobilization contributes to disease control.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据